Ohm's law and drift velocity in conductors
Mechanics with animations and film.
Drift velocity of charge
carriers is related to the DC electric current. This page relates shows how current also depends on the number density of charge carriers, their charge,
the cross sectional area of the conductor, the electric field and properties
of the material. We begin by introducing a limited analogy using mass and gravitational
field as limited analogues of charge and electric field. Alternatively, go straight to
the electrical case.
For sufficiently small droplets, the drag force would be proportional to their speed (and we'll conveniently limit discussion to this case). The drag force also
depends upon their radius, and on the viscosity of the air, but for raindrops
of fixed size, let's include these effects in a constant of proportionality
How much rain falls in a bucket per second?
The top of a bucket has area A. Raindrops of mass m are falling at
a constant speed v (their terminal velocity). There are n drops
per m3. Let's look at the cylinder (length L, area A) above
the bucket in the diagram at right. It contains a number of raindrops
A drop at the very top of the cylinder will leave the cylinder
after a time t = L/v. So the time t for all of the raindrops in
the cylinder to leave is
So the rate of rainfall (in kilograms of water per second) into
the bucket is
I = mass/time = (nALm)/(L/v) = nAvm. (1)
Now let's look at the terminal velocity of the rain drops, which
we have assumed constant. The weight pulls them down, and air resistance
or drag acts in the upwards direction. If they start from rest,
there would be no drag, and their weight would accelerate them
downwards until they reached their terminal velocity v. This is
the velocity at which there is no further acceleration, because
the total force is zero, ie
Kdragv = Fdrag = weight = mg.
We use this to
substitute for v in equation (1) and get:
I = mass/time = nAvm = nAm2g/Kdrag
Here we note that the current is:
(The proportionality to mass squared should be
qualified: Kdrag is only constant if the size is unchanged, so this
proportionality refers to changing the mass by changing the density of the material
from which the drops are made.) Let's now derive Ohm's law for gravity and raindrops.
We'll need the gravitational potential Vgrav, which is the gravitational
potential energy per unit mass, exactly analogous to the electrical case. Take
zero potential energy at height h = 0 and we get:
- proportional to the number of mass carriers/cubic
metre of air (n)
- proportional to the cross sectional area of 'conductor' (A)
- proportional to the square of the mass on an individual mass carrier (m)
- proportional to the magnitude of the field that moves them (g)
- inversely proportional to the proportionality constant for drag (Kdrag)
Vgrav = Ugrav/m = mgh/m = gh.
In the diagram, the cylinder is our resistor (its air is resisting the motion
of raindrops). From one end to the other, the height changes by L, so the (gravitational)
potential difference across it is
Vgrav = gL. So, to get the gravitational version of Ohm's law:
Vgrav/I = (gL)Kdrag/nAm2g = = LKdrag/nAm2.
Let's separate out the geometrical parameters L and A, and combine the other
constants (Kdrag, n and m) into one new constant for this particular
Vgrav/I = (Kdrag/nm2).(L/A) = ρ.(L/A), where ρ =
is the resisitivity of this particular air+rain mix. (In terms of the
analogy, this mix is analogous to a particular substance that conducts electricity.)
Now let's think about this particular cylinder, with its given length and cross
section (analogous to a particular piece of wire).
Vgrav/I = R where
R = ρL/A,
and where R is the resistance of this particular cylinder of this particular
'substance'. Well, we warned you that the analogy was limited, but it's better than water flowing down rapids!
How much charge passes through a conductor per second?
(One must be careful about discussing the dependence on q. Experimentally, one
usually cannot vary q. In cases where one can (eg if the charge carriers are
ions in a solution), then changing q changes the constant of proportional ity
as well.) We
can now rearrange equation (3) to give
|The sketch shows a conductor, length L, cross sectional
area A. There are n charge carriers per cubic metre, each carrier having
a charge q, and moving at an average speed v. The situation is analogous
to the gravitational case except that we have charge q instead of mass
m, and an electric field of magnitude E rather than a gravitational field
of magnitude g. Inside the cylinder there are nAL charge carriers. The
last charge carrier leaves the cylinder after a time t = L/v, so the
total charge that leaves the cylinder per unit time is:
I = (number of charge carriers)*(charge on each)/(time taken for them to leave) = (nAL)q/(L/v) = nAqv.
Let's assume that the average speed v of the carriers is proportional
to the electric field E that is moving them, ie write v = const.E.
The electric field E is V/L where V is the difference in electrial
potential across L, so
Here we note that the current is:
- proportional to the number of charge carriers/cubic metre (n)
- proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor (A)
- proportional to the magnitude of the field that moves them (E)
- proportional to the number of charge carriers/cubic metre of
V/I = (L/A)(1/(nq.const.)), which we can write as
where R is the resistance of this piece of conducting material (whose
units are ohms, Ω), and where ρ is
the resistivity of the material (whose units are ohm metress, Ωm).
V/I = (L/A)ρ = R
Alternatively, we can take the reciprocal of the terms in the above equation
is the conductance of this piece of conductor, (G = 1/R), and where σ is the conductivity of the material,
What if the current doesn't flow uniformly in a conductor? Then we should be
interested in the current density or current per unit area: J = I/A. Combining
the equations above gives the simplest form:
This is also the form that is closest to the way in which Ohm expressed his eponymous
law originally. The
current is parallel to E so in this case the equation has been written